Reykjavik: The Value of Iceland for Greece and Turkey’s Strategy in the Arctic

The President of Iceland, Halla Tómasdóttir, with the Ambassador of Greece to Norway and Iceland, Efthymios Charlaftis.

Greece opens a geopolitical bridge to the North – The new ambassador in Reykjavik, opportunities for Athens, the role of Ankara

The new Ambassador of Greece to Oslo, Mr. Efthymios Charlaftis, visited Reykjavik, Iceland, last month and presented his credentials to the President of Iceland, Ms. Halla Tómasdóttir. Under different circumstances, this would simply be the usual practice of Greece’s diplomatic envoy to Norway also representing the country in the North Atlantic island of the Vikings.

However, the Greek Ambassador crossed half the ocean, facing both opportunities and challenges. Although the Icelandic President expressed admiration for ancient Greek civilization, confirmed alignment on major international issues, and acknowledged the potential for further bilateral relations, all of this takes place at a moment when Athens must seriously take into account geopolitical developments and data.

On February 6, the Icelandic government approved Ankara’s request to open a Turkish embassy in Reykjavik, with operations scheduled to begin within the current year. This Turkish move is not coincidental, nor is it related to the small number of Turks living in Iceland.

The geopolitical upgrade of Iceland

Iceland holds major geostrategic value in the North Atlantic due to its position in the GIUK Gap (the passage between Greenland, Iceland, and the United Kingdom), which controls submarine and commercial routes (a choke point). Although it does not maintain a standing army, its existence is decisive for NATO activity in the Arctic (since 2014 NATO presence has increased through surveillance aircraft and anti-submarine capabilities), and its importance is continuously upgraded due to monitoring Russian activity in the region. Its ties with the United States remain strong, while it also plays an important role in environmental policy, research, and sustainable shipping.

New maritime routes make Iceland a potential logistics hub between the Arctic, Europe, and North America. At the same time, the country functions as a strategic gateway to the maritime routes of the Atlantic and the Arctic Circle, with direct relevance to trade routes leading to Asia.

Naturally, the shift of the global geopolitical center of gravity toward the Arctic highlights it as a critical parameter for strategic balance, as Iceland can function as a control point of sea routes, a NATO operational springboard in times of crisis, and a means of strengthening political, economic, and geopolitical cooperation with major powers (the USA, Russia, China).

Turkey in the Arctic: Strategy and benefits

In recent years, Turkey has been attempting a strategic penetration into the North Atlantic and the Arctic, expanding its presence there through Norway (since 2019 it has conducted five TASE – Turkish Arctic Scientific Expeditions), and through active participation in protocols such as the Spitsbergen for the Svalbard Islands (Greece signed the same protocol in 1925, without any active involvement to date).

Iceland is a member of the Arctic Council, in which Turkey participates as an observer state. The new embassy in Reykjavik will provide Ankara with direct access to countries and institutions of Northern Europe, with multiple benefits—commercial, economic, and geopolitical. Furthermore, it will allow Turkey to shape a new framework of influence over Arctic decisions and programs, to actively participate in security, research, and maritime route issues, and to strengthen its international image. In this way, Turkey upgrades its role as a maritime power and expands its strategic interests in the North Atlantic and Arctic regions.

The establishment of the embassy sends a clear message that Ankara seeks a global presence beyond the Mediterranean and the Balkans—given its already active engagement in Africa. It creates a direct channel of political communication with Iceland and a new springboard for bilateral and multilateral diplomacy near Greenland and the broader Arctic region.

In the medium term, it strengthens Turkey’s image as an emerging global diplomatic power in Arctic affairs, new maritime routes, and energy resources. All of this demonstrates that the Turkish embassy in Reykjavik constitutes a strategic step of political, economic, and geostrategic penetration into Northern Europe and the Arctic.

The Greek community in Iceland

The Greek presence in Iceland is small but noteworthy. The first organized migration movements were mainly linked to academic and professional activities, while the economic crisis of the 2010s led to an exponential increase in the Greek population, which today numbers at least 800 people.

In 2004, when Greece lifted the trophy of the European Football Championship, only 8 Greeks living in Reykjavik celebrated there, as recounted by one of them, Antonis Koumouridis, then a resident physician in Iceland and today a plastic surgeon living and working in Norway. Most Greeks in Iceland live in Reykjavik and work in tourism, hospitality, education, and research, while also participating actively in businesses—including even a Greek loukoumades shop—as well as in educational and cultural activities.

Since Greece does not maintain an embassy in Reykjavik, diplomatic relations are covered by the Greek Embassy in Oslo. Over the past 20 years, however, the Icelandic philhellene Rafn Alexander Sigurdsson, Greek Honorary Consulate in Iceland, has significantly contributed to strengthening bilateral relations, supporting the Greek community and acting as a bridge between the two countries.

In 2017, during the visit there of Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew and Metropolitan Cleopas of Sweden, the foundations were laid for the Greek Orthodox parish of Apostle Bartholomew in Reykjavik, under the jurisdiction of the Metropolis of Sweden and All Scandinavia, recognized by the Icelandic authorities. Despite its establishment, however, the spiritual needs of Greeks remain significant, as there is no permanent or regular priestly presence.

At present, Greece maintains limited contact with Icelandic universities through programs such as Erasmus. At a time when Turkey possesses structures such as the national DEHUKAM Center for Maritime Law and Sea Studies, and systematically seeks to establish footholds to challenge the status quo in the Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean, Greece urgently needs to utilize the opportunities provided by its diaspora and the Greek shipping industry.

Air and cultural connection Athens – Reykjavik

The restoration of the direct air connection between Athens and Reykjavik, which was suspended two years ago due to the bankruptcy of the carrier Play OG, is a critical factor for strengthening Greece–Iceland relations. A possible new connection would bring multiple benefits: it would boost tourism and Icelandic visits to Greece, promote bilateral economic and commercial relations, facilitate students and entrepreneurs, and ensure better service for the needs of Greeks living in Iceland, while also increasing the international footprint of Greek airlines.

The historical and cultural dimension further strengthens the importance of Greece for the “Frozen Island,” and vice versa. Greece is particularly beloved by Icelanders: Iceland is referred to as Thule by Pytheas of Massalia and Pliny, while Icelandic mentality is so similar to the Greek that Icelanders have been described as “the Mediterranean’s of the North.”

It is no coincidence that a favorite Greek song of Icelandic philosophy professor at the University of Oslo and internationally leading expert on Plotinus, Eyjólfur Kjalar Emilsson, is “The Train Leaves at Eight”, with lyrics by Manos Eleftheriou and music by Mikis Theodorakis. This cultural familiarity makes closer ties between the two countries both natural and strategically beneficial.

Source:

Π. Παύλος – Γ. Σαχίνης: Η αντιμετώπιση του Ιράν από ΗΠΑ – Ισραήλ ως «δαίμονα» της ανθρωπότητας και η Ελλάδα

Σε αυτήν την ωριαία ραδιοφωνική συζήτηση με τον Γιώργο Σαχίνη, στο Ράδιο 98.4, τη Δευτέρα 23 Μαρτίου 2026, ο Παναγιώτης Παύλος, ερευνητής Φιλοσοφίας στο Πανεπιστήμιο του Όσλο, προβαίνει σε μια διαφορετική ανάγνωση των εξελίξεων στον πόλεμο ΗΠΑ-Ισραήλ εναντίον του Ιράν.

Αναφερόμενος στη γενικότερη ανάφλεξη στη Μέση Ανατολή και τη Δυτική Ασία, εξηγεί γιατί είναι εξίσου σημαντική στην ανάλυση και η “θεολογία” της ισχύος, όταν μάλιστα εμφανίζεται απέναντι στο σύστημα του Ιράν με τις θεοκρατικές αντιλήψεις αυτό που ο Π. Παύλος αποκαλεί «δυτική εκδοχή τζιχάντ», κατά την οποία οι ΗΠΑ αντιμετωπίζουν το Ιράν ως “δαίμονα” της ανθρωπότητας. Ενώ αίσθηση προκαλούν και όσα επισημαίνει σε αυτές τις συνθήκες για την Ελλάδα.

Ακούστε τη συνέντευξη εδώ:

https://youtu.be/DFrGFArDF10?is=FR3Zn_I5QDYrOAoT

Πηγή:

https://www.neakriti.gr/kosmos/2169337_p-paylos-i-antimetopisi-toy-iran-apo-tis-ipa-israil-os-daimona-tis-anthropotitas-kai

Δυτική εκδοχή Τζιχάντ η αντιμετώπιση του Ιράν από τις ΗΠΑ ως δαίμονα της ανθρωπότητας

Στιγμιότυπο από την εκπομπή REVIEW με την Ιρένα Αργύρη, στην τηλεόραση της ΝΑΥΤΕΜΠΟΡΙΚΗ, Σάββατο 21 Μαρτίου 2026.

Το Σάββατο 21 Μαρτίου 2026, είχα τη χαρά και την τιμή να είμαι προσκεκλημένος να συζητήσουμε με την οικοδέσποινα της εκπομπής REVIEW, στην τηλεόραση της ΝΑΥΤΕΜΠΟΡΙΚΗΣ, Ιρένα Αργύρη, τον πόλεμο στο Ιράν.

Ειδικότερα, εστιάσαμε σε μια σειρά κρίσιμων θεμάτων και παραμέτρων:

1. Το πολιτισμικό υπόβαθρο της κρίσης στη Μέση Ανατολή και τη Μεσοποταμία.

2. Οι κοσμοαντιλήψεις και ανθρωπότυποι Δύσης και Ανατολής που συγκρούονται στο πεδίο του Ιράν.

3. Η έννοια της θρησκείας στην Ανατολή και Δύση και η εναωμάτωσή της στην πολιτική.

4. Η επίθεση στο Ιράν ως νέα εκδοχή Σταυροφοριών.

5. Η έννοια του χρόνου σε Ανατολή και Δύση και η επίδρασή της στη χάραξη στρατηγικής των “παικτών”.

6. Ο Δυτικός Ορθολογισμός στη γεωπολιτική και οι δυνατότητες επίλυσης της σύγκρουσης μεταξύ Δύσης και Ανατολής.

7. Ο ρόλος της Ελλάδος: τί είναι η Ελλάδα για τους γείτονες, τον πολιτισμό, τη δύση και για την ανατολή, και κυρίως τους ίδιους τους Έλληνες. Τι είμαστε, τι νομίζουμε ότι είμαστε, τι πρέπει να είμαστε, πώς πρέπει να αντιλαμβανόμαστε τον εαυτό μας και συνεπώς πώς πρέπει να πορευθεί ο Ελληνισμός.

Μπορείτε να παρακολουθήσετε τη συνέντευξη από αυτόν τον σύνδεσμο:

https://youtu.be/ZsSjWZioNNU?is=G3zsuH4BANqLa-8J

Η Πίστη στην εποχή μας: Χριστός Παντοκράτωρ και Θεράπων

Σε αυτό το επεισόδιο του νορβηγικού Podcast Praktverk συναντάμε στο Όσλο τον Νορβηγό Ορθόδοξο ιερέα π. Johannes Solberg και τον Έλληνα ερευνητή φιλοσοφίας στο Πανεπιστήμιο του Όσλο Panagiotis Pavlos σε μια συζήτηση για τον Χριστό Παντοκράτορα — όχι μόνο ως τον Κυρίαρχο των πάντων, αλλά ως Εκείνον που βαστάζει, στηρίζει και διακονεί ολόκληρη την κτίση.

Η συζήτηση είναι στα Νορβηγικά αλλά μπορείτε να ενεργοποιήσετε ελληνικούς υπότιτλους σε προβολή YouTube από τον υπολογιστή σας.

Χρονικά σημεία:

00:00 Χριστός Παντοκράτωρ – κυρίαρχος των πάντων και διάκονος
00:33 Παρουσίαση του Panagiotis Pavlos
01:26 Φιλοσοφία, μουσική και βυζαντινή ψαλτική
05:04 Βυζαντινή μουσική, λαϊκή μουσική και παράδοση
08:38 Νορβηγία, Ελλάδα και εθνικός χαρακτήρας
12:45 Ιεραρχία, αυθεντία και οι συγκρούσεις της εποχής μας
16:20 Η χριστιανική εξουσία ως ταπείνωση
20:24 Παντοκράτωρ, Ecce Homo και σύγχρονες παρεξηγήσεις
23:40 Ο νοετικός άνθρωπος και η απώλεια της μυστικής εμπειρίας
27:15 Ορθολογισμός, μεταμοντερνισμός και αγώνας για εξουσία
32:36 Η Ελλάδα ανάμεσα στην πίστη, την παράδοση και τη νεωτερικότητα
33:02 Στηρίξτε το «Tro i tiden» μέσω VIPPS
36:30 Ηθική των σχέσεων, πολιτική και πολιτισμική σύγκρουση
45:10 Είναι ο Χριστός πραγματικά η αλήθεια για εμάς;
48:35 Αλήθεια, κοινότητα και εκκλησία
52:15 Η Ενσάρκωση και η μεταμόρφωση του κόσμου
55:10 Ο σκοπός της ζωής, ο θάνατος και η οντολογική θεραπεία
57:50 Κοινότητα, αλήθεια και η ταυτότητα του ανθρώπου
01:07:28 Ο Παντοκράτωρ με ανοιχτές αγκάλες
01:08:40 Ταπείνωση, ηγεσία και αληθινή αυθεντία
01:11:15 Πόνος, κακό και ο δρόμος προς την ταπείνωση
01:13:03 Επίλογος

Η συζήτηση ξεκινά από τη σύγχρονη αναστάτωση γύρω από την ιεραρχία, την αυθεντία, την εξουσία και τη νομιμότητα, και εισέρχεται στην πρόσφατη δημόσια συζήτηση μεταξύ του Asle Toje και της Hilde Sandvik για τον Χριστό Παντοκράτορα σε αντιπαραβολή με το Ecce Homo — τον Χριστό ως τον πάσχοντα και ευάλωτο. Ποια εικόνα του Χριστού αναδύεται σήμερα στο πολιτικό τοπίο; Ένας Θεός δύναμης ή αυτοθυσίας, όπως αναρωτιέται η Sandvik;

Συμμετέχουν:
Audun Janøy
πατήρ Johannes Solberg
Panagiotis Pavlos

Ηχητική επεξεργασία και συνεργασία: Daniel Brew.

Πηγή:

https://youtu.be/9LVR-ZJlykM?is=prVoehCkixeB2gVQ

Geoffrey Pyatt at Oslo Energy Forum 2026: Critical Minerals, Aluminium, and Energy Security

Discussions focused on resilience in critical mineral supply chains, strategic autonomy in materials such as aluminium, and the role of energy policy in industrial resilience.

The Oslo Energy Forum 2026 concluded at the historic Holmenkollen venue under this year’s theme “Energy and Security in Unpredictable Times – A New Global Order?”, bringing together the international community to discuss the challenges and opportunities of the global energy transition.

Former U.S. Ambassador to Greece, Geoffrey R. Pyatt, now Senior Managing Director of Energy and Critical Minerals at McLarty Associates, stood out for his interventions on the strategic importance of critical minerals, transatlantic cooperation, energy security, and the geopolitical dimensions of the current energy crisis.

Reflecting on the longstanding U.S.–Norway energy partnership, Pyatt said:

“Four years ago, when Russia began curtailing gas deliveries to Europe as part of a hybrid strategy for the full scale invasion of Ukraine, it was Norwegian pipeline gas and American LNG that came to the rescue. Later, I had the honor of co-chairing, along with Petroleum and Energy Minister Terje Aasland, the US – Norway Energy and Climate Dialogue, where we deepened cooperation on energy security, critical mineral supply chains, and support for Ukraine. Against this background, I was thrilled to be part of the Oslo Energy Forum this week.”

Pyatt participated in the panels “The Role of Critical Minerals and Materials” alongside Landon Derentz, Vice President for Energy and Infrastructure at the Atlantic Council, and Eivind Kallevik, President and CEO of Norsk Hydro, as well as “Challenges for the Energy Industry” with Jason Bordoff, Founding Director of Columbia University’s CGEP (Center on Global Energy Policy), and Vijay Swarup, former Senior Director for Climate Strategy and Technology.

Discussions focused on resilience in critical mineral supply chains, strategic autonomy in materials such as aluminium, and the role of energy policy in industrial resilience. A key takeaway was that moving from ambition to implementation requires alignment of energy policy, industrial strategy, and recycling policies. Aluminium resilience has two dimensions: in the short term, increasing in-region recycling strengthens supply security and reduces energy consumption; in the long term, strategic autonomy depends on competitive and reliable energy supply.

Addressing geopolitical challenges, Pyatt emphasized the importance of continuing support for Ukraine as Russia continues to target energy infrastructure:

“Minister of Foreign Affairs Espen Barth Eide made important remarks on Kremlin attacks on energy infrastructure. It is critical for all of us to sustain support for the energy sector while pushing for the immediate ceasefire urged by Ukraine, the U.S., Norway, and the EU. Kudos to Norway’s MFA for strong leadership in the G7+ energy sector support group and for consistently highlighting the energy dimension of NATO’s response to Russia’s full-scale invasion.”

Drawing on his experience as Assistant Secretary in the U.S. Bureau of Energy Resources, Pyatt analyzed vulnerabilities in supply chains, the role of critical minerals, and the strategic importance of the Arctic and Greenland for Europe and the U.S. His presence highlighted the close U.S.–Norway cooperation in energy and critical minerals, reinforced by the 2023 joint declaration on secure and sustainable supply chains and clean energy technologies. Throughout the forum, discussions showcased the energy transition as both an opportunity and a challenge for Europe and the global community.

Concluding his talk, Pyatt stressed the fact that energy transition and critical mineral security are not just economic issues, but are central to geopolitical stability.

The Oslo Energy Forum 2026 reaffirmed its status as a high-level international event, with participation from Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide, Chief of Defence Eirik Kristoffersen, the head of the Norwegian Oil Fund Nicolai Tangen, former Norwegian Ambassador to Greece Frode Øyvind Andersen, the Global Director for the World Bank’s Energy and Extractives Global Department Demetrios Papathanasiou, and ambassadors from countries across Latin America, Europe, and Asia. Their presence underscored the forum’s strategic significance for Europe, NATO, and the international energy community.

Pyatt’s interventions, together with the high-level discussions and messages of collaboration, underscored the critical role of critical minerals, strategic autonomy, and U.S.–Norway cooperation in shaping the new global energy order.

Source: